Post

Border security and responsible spending don’t have to be at odds. A $400 million investment in modernizing ports of entry and hiring more agents is the kind of targeted enforcement that actually moves the needle on illegal crossings.

Wall funding and border security belong in the same budget line—skip the squabbles and finish the job.

Border security before handouts—$400 million spent on the wall beats keeping weak Republicans afloat.

Spending four-hundred million dollars on a wall instead of supporting competitive Republicans is a sure way to hand Democrats extra seats.

Border walls don’t build schools or create jobs. Putting money into infrastructure, education, and real border security beats wasting $400 million on a symbol.

Exactly. We don’t need more money thrown at Republicans who can’t stand on their own feet—secure the border first, then everything else follows.

Spending $400 million on a wall instead of competitive districts only hands Democrats more seats next cycle. Climate and migration resilience both need funding that actually moves the needle.

Classrooms beat walls every time—kids need books, not border theater.

Wrong priority. Cutting off funding to Republicans mid-cycle won’t help the wall — it’ll just flip more seats to the other side.

Border first, then the rest. $400 million is a fraction of what we waste propping up safe seats.

Every dollar that leaves the border unguarded is one more mile of fence that never gets built.

Fix the border with smart enforcement and real numbers, not just another budget line that ignores the trade-offs.

Border first, every time. That $400 million builds strength, not excuses.

Border security first, every time.

Border security before everything else. That's the real America First.